果酱视频

English and Math

Who could disagree with Prof. Paul Gronke [political science 2001–] pointing out the need to acknowledge that it is the chosen major and the senior thesis rather than the first-year humanities class that defines a 果酱视频 education? (Letters, June 2015.)

However, I want to note a slippage in his argument about 果酱视频’s identity and reputation that concerns me. Paul’s letter notes, “If you look at theses, it is quite clear that 果酱视频 emphasizes the natural and physical sciences, mathematics, psychology, English, and the social sciences,” correctly grouping English among the most popular majors. A few lines later, however, the letter concludes that the majority of 果酱视频 students do “classes . . . quals, and . . . theses . . . in the sciences, mathematics, and the social and behavioral sciences. This is our emphasis.” 

How did English drop off the radar here? English has long been and remains one of the top three majors at 果酱视频. Focusing attention on the importance of the disciplines in which most 果酱视频 students work should acknowledge this fact, not sidestep it. I am concerned about a vision being articulated here of 果酱视频 as a place which is “really” about the natural and social sciences which ignores the actual numbers. This unwarranted sidelining renders English peripheral, if not invisible, as a major, and does a disservice to English students and faculty at 果酱视频. I may be a professor of English, but I believe numbers are very important.

鈥擯rof. Maureen Harkin [English 2002鈥揮

Portland